Tedious, ungrammatical, unoriginal and tasteless crap from someone old enough to know better.
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Not wishing to distract you from the posting a few minutes ago
I know that politicians are meant to be impervious to publicity, but was it really necessary to photograph this chap (whoever he is) at the point of conception?
Please remember to read the preceding post.
16 comments:
Anonymous
said...
How could you tell this fetus was male or female anyway? Did the sonogram show it sucking its finger or its penis?
He's back! He's back! It's the same one. I would not presume to offer him robes, shoes or rings, and as a pink liberal treehugger, no calves, but will fatted lentils do? Not that we are suggesting that you have been living with harlots - there is only so far that parallels can be drawn.
yes, the old bugger will be dusting off his old blog any day now. What do you think of Gordon Brown? Is David Cameron a man of the people? Is John McCain the right man to lead the world into the next decade? That should get him going.
16 comments:
How could you tell this fetus was male or female anyway? Did the sonogram show it sucking its finger or its penis?
At least he kept his jacket on.
So that's who Nick Clegg is.
Thanks Vicus.
I don't trust politicians with young families.
Even their own.
I hear he used to be successful with the young ladies.
God knows how.
nope, never heard of him - whatever happened to Jeremy Thorpe?
goodwill, scrabble, eton, family history and something else I've forgotten already. . .
. . .what's that new gizmo-gadgety thing then in your sidebar?
what kind of braces? the sort that hold your trousers up, or the kind that sort your teeth out?
Is that what Ming Campbell looks like these days? And why the change of name?
I do get confused.
It's Jo Grimond. Or is that the expression?
My money's on the two Davids. Occupying the same body, and both struggling to get out.
Eeeew!
He admits that he is "thrilled with his bits" and that he "only had 30 sexual partners"..
which I interpret to mean that he alternated between his left hand and right hand 15 times.
Wanker.
He's back! He's back! It's the same one. I would not presume to offer him robes, shoes or rings, and as a pink liberal treehugger, no calves, but will fatted lentils do?
Not that we are suggesting that you have been living with harlots - there is only so far that parallels can be drawn.
Donn. Is it me to whom you refer as wanker? I trust not. Fat and fucking would seem to be the minimum qualifications on that description.
Thank you all for your knowledge of members of the Liberal party. I lost interest when Gladstone died.
He's been here as well!
yes, the old bugger will be dusting off his old blog any day now.
What do you think of Gordon Brown?
Is David Cameron a man of the people?
Is John McCain the right man to lead the world into the next decade?
That should get him going.
Post a Comment